神经药理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 1-.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1396.2023.01.001

• 研究论文 •    下一篇

二甲双胍改善糖尿病患者认知功能有效性和安全性的Meta分析

高珊,笱玉兰   

  1. 1. 湖北中医药大学第一临床学院,武汉,430060,中国  2. 武汉市中西医结合医院神经内科,武汉,430022,中国
  • 出版日期:2023-02-26 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 笱玉兰,E-mail: gougouxuan@126.com
  • 作者简介:高珊,湖北中医药大学硕士研究生在读;研究方向:神经病学;E-mail: 2226936482@qq.com

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Metformin in Improving Cognitive Function in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

GAO Shan, GOU Yu-lan   

  1. 1. The First Clinical College, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430060, China  2. Department of Neurology, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, 430022, China
  • Online:2023-02-26 Published:2023-11-29

摘要:

目的:系统评价二甲双胍治疗糖尿病对患者认知情况的影响。方法:对中国生物医药文献服务平台(CBM)、CNKI、PubMed等数据库进行检索,搜索收集自建库至2022年12月31日发表的与二甲双胍改善糖尿病患者认知功能有关的随机对照试验,利用 RevMan5.3进行数据的统计和分析,就MMSE评分、MoCA评分、NIHSS评分及不良反应等结果进行分析。结果:在符合纳入标准的十篇文献中,共1328名患者被纳入研究,其中治疗组663例,对照组665例。Meta分析结果提示:磺脲类降糖药观察组的MMSE评分优于对照组,且数据结果有显著差异,但胰岛素类降糖药组其观察组MMSE评分低于对照组,差异显著。MoCA评分观察组与对照组无证据支持有统计学差异;观察组的NIHSS评分显著高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义;观察组与对照组之间的不良反应比较无显著性差异。结论:二甲双胍对改善糖尿病患者的认知功能具有良好的作用,可以促进神经功能的恢复,但与胰岛素相比未体现明显的神经认知功能改善作用,但具有较好的安全性,可以用于糖尿病伴认知障碍的治疗。

关键词: 二甲双胍, 认知障碍, 糖尿病, 随机对照试验, Meta分析

Abstract:

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effect of metformin treatment for diabetes on patients' cognitive condition. Methods: The databases of CBM、CNKI and PubMed were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of metformin for the treatment of diabetes mellitus published between the date of establishment and December 31, 2022, and the data were statistically analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software, according to MMSE scores, MoCA scores, NIHSS scores and adverse effects were analyzed. Results: These 10 papers contain 1328 patients, and there are 663 patients in the treatment group while 665 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that the MMSE scores in the observation group of sulfonylureas were higher than those in the control group, and there was significant difference, but in the insulin group the MMSE scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. The difference between the MoCA scores and the control group was not statistically significant; the NIHSS scores of treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the difference between groups was statistically significant; and the adverse effects between the treatment group and the control group were statistically significant. No statistically significant difference was observed in adverse events between two groups. Conclusion: Metformin can improve the cognitive function and promote the recovery of neurological function in diabetic patients. However, no significant improvement in cognitive function was observed compared with insulin. Metformin has a good safety profile, so it can be used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus with cognitive impairment.

Key words: metformin, cognitive impairment, diabetes mellitus, randomized controlled trial, Meta-analysis